https://www.engineeringnews.co.za
Africa|Building|Energy|Environment|Nuclear|Power|Resources|Infrastructure
Africa|Building|Energy|Environment|Nuclear|Power|Resources|Infrastructure
africa|building|energy|environment|nuclear|power|resources|infrastructure

Organisations raise concern over lack of public participation in nuclear energy talks

Koeberg nuclear power station

Koeberg nuclear power station

Photo by Creamer Media

2nd September 2021

By: Marleny Arnoldi

Deputy Editor Online

     

Font size: - +

Societal wellbeing organisations the Southern African Faith Communities’ Environment Institute (Safcei) and Earthlife Africa Johannesburg have expressed their concern about the South African government pushing for more nuclear energy, while renewables wait in the wings.

The two organisations took the government to court in 2017 over what it deemed an unconstitutional R1-trillion nuclear deal with Russia.

Safcei executive director Francesca de Gasparis says the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy seems single-minded on touting nuclear energy as the solution to the country’s energy crisis.

She motivates this by pointing to recent developments – the National Energy Regulator of South Africa being due to concur with the Minister’s Determination to start procurement processes for 2 500 MW of new nuclear energy generation capacity; and Eskom seeking a site licence from the National Nuclear Regulator (NNR) for Thyspunt to host a nuclear power station.

Earthlife director Makoma Lekalakala claims that, “based on poorly organised public hearings organised by the NNR, it is clear that government is not committed to meaningful engagement with the public”.

This while some of the key issues raised by communities around Thyspunt relate to the lack of meaningful participation in the matter.

She believes public hearings have become a box-ticking exercise, rather than an opportunity to better understand the implications and potential impacts of building infrastructure of this nature.

Lekalakala says that, as nuclear power plants require huge subsidies, which will divert resources away from other social needs, the public needs to be given an opportunity to weigh in on these far-reaching decisions.

The organisations believe government should have learned its lesson in 2017 about the importance of meaningful public participation.

Safcei and Earthlife agree that there are safer and cheaper options to nuclear energy, and that can be brought online quicker, while solving country's energy problems without plunging the economy into further debt.

Edited by Chanel de Bruyn
Creamer Media Senior Deputy Editor Online

Comments

Showroom

Stewarts & Lloyds
Stewarts & Lloyds

Stewarts & Lloyds today supplies steel and tube, pipe and fittings, valves, pumps, irrigation, fencing, profiling and roofing products. The cash...

VISIT SHOWROOM 
Environmental Assurance (Pty) Ltd.
Environmental Assurance (Pty) Ltd.

ENVASS is a customer and solutions-driven environmental consultancy with established divisions, serviced by highly qualified and experienced...

VISIT SHOWROOM 

Latest Multimedia

sponsored by

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION







sq:0.094 0.155s - 183pq - 6rq
Subscribe Now