https://www.engineeringnews.co.za

Engineering gut feel

27th July 2018

By: Terry Mackenzie-hoy

     

Font size: - +

So, there I was at a site meeting. As acoustics engineers, we had designed a roof build-up for the building which was under construction, firstly, to comply with thermal insulation requirements and, secondly, to comply with sound insulation requirements.

We had been called to the site meeting to discuss the roof build-up. The contractor had offered an alternative which, he said, would result in considerable savings. At the meeting, the contractor proposed that the fire- proof stiff board we proposed be replaced with flammable shutter plywood and that the fibreglass insulation be replaced with a product made of cellulose. We said, no deal. The quantity surveyor asked us why not. I said, they are not the same thing. Both products may do the same acoustically, but they both are not as well fire-rated as our specification.

Oh, said the quantity surveyor, pulling out a specification sheet for the cellulose. It was fine from a fire point of view, he said. It says so in the spec sheet. So, I said, what about the shutter ply? Oh, he said, if we mount the insulation with the cellulose at the bottom of the layer, will that be okay? I said, ask the fire engineer. But we do not think it is a good idea. But, he insisted, will it be okay for sound transmission? Yes, I said, but fire . . . nope he said, fire is not your problem, is it?

So, I went back to the office and we took some cellulose and put it on the braai. It burnt like a fire starter. I called the contractor and said, hey, bru, this stuff burns like kaggel hout (fire wood). No, he said, it does not. We tried burning it. It does not burn. So, I sent my mate, Zaine, to collect the sample and, lo! It burnt not. So, I thought, it cannot be more my responsibility than that.

Six months later, the roof of the building caught fire and the one wing burnt down. The rest of the consulting team and I were sued for a total of R25-million. We all have insurance and when it was found that the fire was the result of a person working with a blow torch but without a ‘hot work’ permit, the whole thing collapsed. We did our own investigation and found that (a) the cellulose had been treated to make it not so flammable as our sample, that burnt on the braai fire, (b) some of the treatment had not been thorough, so the cellulose was still flammable, and (c) the contractor had laid the shutterply as the bottom layer, and not as specified. It would have been so much less costly if the change had not been made.

I do not think the quantity surveyor was to blame – he went by the spec sheet and assumed the contractor would build in accordance with the drawings. We, on the other hand, had assumed that the spec sheet was wrong, since we had no experience with cellulose being nonflammable and had, thus, specified the nonflammable stiff board as backup. Under this condition, we did not worry about the contractor making a construction error, since any error would not matter.

We knew, too, that contractors can easily close off roof insulation without any inspection, so it was as wise to take any errors they could make out of the occasion.

The main fault was equating construction cost while ignoring the cost and consequences of construction error. Engineers have a ‘gut feel’ as to if certain changes are a good idea or not. When people want to change some design, since doing so will be cheaper, they should ask why the engineer came up with the design, to begin with. Generally, it is not because the engineer did not consider the cost – the design is often the best all-round solution. Then, others, less experienced on all fronts, suggest a cheaper solution and argue the engineer into a corner. It is a poor idea. Rather stick with the engineer’s design or pay more fees to get the price down. Engineering gut feel is worth a lot – ignore it at your peril, at your cost.

Edited by Martin Zhuwakinyu
Creamer Media Senior Deputy Editor

Comments

Showroom

WearCheck
WearCheck

Leading condition monitoring specialists, WearCheck, help boost machinery lifespan and reduce catastrophic component failure through the scientific...

VISIT SHOWROOM 
Multotec
Multotec

Multotec, recognised industry leaders in metallurgy and process engineering help mining houses across the world process minerals more efficiently,...

VISIT SHOWROOM 

Latest Multimedia

sponsored by

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION







sq:0.074 0.119s - 144pq - 2rq
Subscribe Now