Africa|Energy|Eskom|Paper|Power|Projects|Renewable Energy|Renewable-Energy
Africa|Energy|Eskom|Paper|Power|Projects|Renewable Energy|Renewable-Energy

Nersa extends deadline for comment on Eskom’s move to reserve grid for public IPPs

26th May 2024

By: Terence Creamer

Creamer Media Editor


Font size: - +

The National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa) has extended to June 17 the deadline for comment on Eskom’s application to preserve and reserve grid capacity for independent power producers (IPPs) participating in public procurement processes implemented in line with Section 34 of the Electricity Regulation Act (ERA).

The initial deadline was May 25.

In its submission, Eskom is seeking permission to discriminate in favour of public procurement IPP projects, at the expense of private IPP projects, arguing that such discrimination would be in the “public interest”.

“Without any form of protection, public procurement programmes remain incapable of competing with the much more agile and well-funded private sector energy procurement programmes.

“Therefore, without grid preservation/reservation in favour of the public energy procurement programmes, these programmes are likely to continue failing as evidenced by the recent failure of Bid Window 6 (BW6) of the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme,” Eskom says in its submission.

During BW6 in 2022, none of the 23 wind projects vying for 3 200 MW advanced to the preferred-bidder stage, owing to the grid capacity on which their bids were based being allocated to projects that secured grid connection budget quotes over the same capacity.

This was made possible by reforms made to Schedule 2 of the Electricity Regulation Act, which allowed private projects to proceed without a licence and which Eskom says, “resulted in an exponential increase in applications for grid connections from IPPs with private power purchase agreements”.

Private IPPs, Eskom claims, are moving at a faster pace to secure grid-connection capacity compared with Section 34 IPPs, which must go through a protracted procurement process.

Although Nersa’s consultation paper makes specific reference to BW7, the deadline for which has already shifted out once and appears poised to be extended again, Eskom’s submission is suggestive of broader and ongoing preservation and reservation requests.

Market reaction is expected to be negative, given that it is in clear breach of the open and non-discriminatory access stipulated in legislation and the Grid Code.

In its submission, Eskom bases its public-interest justification on the argument that the continued failure of public procurement programmes will erode investor confidence, undermine government efforts to attract foreign direct investment, and frustrate ambitions related to the just energy transition and climate mitigation.

Edited by Creamer Media Reporter



ESAB showroom image
ESAB South Africa

ESAB South Arica, the leading supplier of high-end welding and cutting products to the Southern African industrial market is based in...


SoToxaTM - Mobile test system


Latest Multimedia

sponsored by

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?







sq:0.337 0.39s - 160pq - 2rq
Subscribe Now