https://www.engineeringnews.co.za
Africa|Efficiency|electrification|Energy|Nuclear|Projects|Resources|Service|Tourism|Infrastructure
Africa|Efficiency|electrification|Energy|Nuclear|Projects|Resources|Service|Tourism|Infrastructure
africa|efficiency|electrification|energy|nuclear|projects|resources|service|tourism|infrastructure

Concern raised over R1.5bn cut to electrification budget

Concern raised over R1.5bn cut to electrification budget

Photo by Creamer Media

23rd July 2020

By: Terence Creamer

Creamer Media Editor

     

Font size: - +

Concern continues to be raised over the fact that the biggest cut made to the Department of Minerals Resources and Energy’s (DMRE’s) 2020/21 budget is for the electrification of poor households, especially in those province with the largest connection backlogs.

The cuts, which were signalled in early July, were confirmed in a Budget Vote speech delivered on July 21 by Tourism Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi-Ngubane on behalf of Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe, who was in hospital for Covid-19.

She said the main appropriation for the DMRE budget had been reduced by R1.55-billion, from R9.34-billion to R7.76-billion, with the R1-billion cut to the Integrated National Electrification Programme (INEP) Eskom grant contributing the lion’s share of the reduction, together with the R500-million cut made to the INEP grant for municipalities.

Prior to the adjustments, which were made in response to the National Treasury’s call for department budgets to be reprioritised in light of the Covid-19 pandemic, R3-billion had been allocated for the INEP-Eskom grant and R1.85-billion to the INEP-municipalities grant.

In earlier engagements with lawmakers, the DMRE confirmed that the reduction would delay the implementation of planned bulk infrastructure projects, and decrease the number of new household connections in 2020/21 by 43 000 to 137 000, from the initial  180 000 connections targeted for the year.

The reduction in the INEP-Eskom grant would, the department also confirmed, have a significant negative impact on the Eastern Cape, Limpopo and KwaZulu-Natal provinces, which currently have the largest electricity backlogs in the country.

The Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources and Energy recommended that the department develop a mitigating strategy to ensure that the remaining R3.36-billion in INEP grants were distributed on time, to avoid a situation whereby funds were reallocated or rolled over.

The committee also encouraged the department to consult with the National Treasury for additional funding for the programme, prior to the Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement.

Kubayi-Ngubane said the department had engaged with both municipalities and Eskom to agree on the criterion used to determine the portion of the budget reduction of R1.5-billion to be absorbed by the various municipalities and the utility.

“This reduction is on projects that are amongst others not ready for delivery and can be moved to outer years.”

On learning of the proposed reductions, Energy Governance South Africa (EGSA), which is a network of over 110 concerned individuals and organisations established to promote good governance in the energy sector, questioned the rationale for the reductions.

“It is difficult to understand how the reduction in spending on electrification and energy efficiency fall within the criteria of Treasury’s instruction to cut ‘spending activities that are not critical to the core service delivery requirements of the department’.”

“Not only is such expenditure core to the purpose of the DMRE – the Department of Energy’s annual report for 2018/19 refers to this as its ‘flagship programme’ – but it is also one action that the DMRE can take that would help poor and vulnerable South Africans cope with Covid-19.”

EGSA recommend that a substantial amount of the R1.5-billion reduction should rather be removed from the R1.1-billion allocated for nuclear energy regulation and management and the R939-million allocated to the South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa).

Likewise, the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse question the allocation to Necsa, given it is not fulfilling its accountability obligations.

“Expanding our nuclear facilities is not urgent, nor is it in the electricity plan for the future, and should be rejected, and that funding reallocated to other areas of the energy portfolio,” Outa said, while recommending an increased electrification allocation towards offgrid electrification.


 

Edited by Creamer Media Reporter

Comments

Showroom

Weir Minerals Africa and Middle East
Weir Minerals Africa and Middle East

Weir Minerals Europe, Middle East and Africa is a global supplier of excellent minerals solutions, including pumps, valves, hydrocyclones,...

VISIT SHOWROOM 
Willard
Willard

Rooted in the hearts of South Africans, combining technology and a quest for perfection to bring you a battery of peerless standing. Willard...

VISIT SHOWROOM 

Latest Multimedia

sponsored by

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION







sq:0.109 0.16s - 162pq - 2rq
Subscribe Now