TNPA offers insight into future plans for SA’s ports

5th May 2014

By: Shirley le Guern

Creamer Media Correspondent

  

Font size: - +

The Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA) has embarked on a national road show that will provide both internal and external stakeholders with a glimpse of short-, medium- and long-term planning for South Africa’s nine coastal ports.

In a preamble to the Durban leg, it was stressed that port demand drivers such as volumes, shipping technology, the cost of capital and sustainability had played a role in planning. Another important factor was determining break points that would inform scenario planning and ultimately the formulation of national development strategies.

TNPA’s senior manager capacity planning Desmond Simpson said that, in the short term, he did not expect “much change” at Richards Bay, where the plan to expand and rehabilitate the dry bulk terminal had been placed on hold.

The project would return to the table once the increase in volumes had been verified. In the medium term, if this project went ahead, he said the TNPA would extend the finger jetty in the harbour to provide another two coal berths as well as an additional bulk liquid berth.

There were no immediate plans to construct a container terminal in Richards Bay, but in the longer term, the TNPA could develop a 22 km stretch inland from the existing Port in the direction of the N2 highway along the coastline adjacent to the industrial development zone (IDZ). Further future developments included a possible additional coal facility as well as one to handle liquid petroleum gas (LPG) on the southern breakwater. This would be sufficiently far away from the local community and nearby developments and allowed for a 500 m exclusion zone.

Simpson said that Durban’s dig-out port was in its earliest stages and that various investigations were under way. He said this would provide 16 additional container berths, as well as facilities for automotive exports as it was located close to the Toyota manufacturing plant.

One critical issue under consideration was the relocation of the single-buoy mooring, as this would be located directly in the line of shipping. He suggested the possibility of doing away with this altogether, or moving it past the southern breakwater, and creating a “very deep water berth” at the front of the port.

A request for proposals (RFP) had also gone out for the construction of a cruise terminal at berth AB in Durban, which was expected to connect with the Point Waterfront development and at E Berth in the Port of Cape Town.

He said that once the rehabilitation of berths along Maydon Wharf was complete, Durban would have seven berths for deeper and longer vessels. This would facilitate the consolidation of different types of cargo. The proposed purchase of additional land at Bayhead had been abandoned, but there were still plans to improve logistics and ease back of port congestion.

Development of Salisbury Island would provide capacity for a further 1.8-million twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEUs) provided the TNPA acquired the full amount of land needed from the Department of Public Works, he added.

Turning to East London, he said it was extremely difficult to develop this port as it was not only hemmed in by the city but had a bottom section that comprised hard granite which required blasting, raising environmental issues. Another constraint was the steep bank alongside this river port. The grain elevator which was “on its last legs” would be dismantled shortly.

From 2019 onwards, the TNPA envisaged the speeding up of maritime commercial activity which included the creation of recreational and restaurant facilities. This was in line with the TNPA’s vision of creating “a people’s port concept”.

He said the TNPA had also looked at a proposal to build the outer basin in the long term. However, at this stage, the costs were exorbitant and the expected volumes too low.

Simpson said that although the Port of Ngqura had been constructed to facilitate the import and beneficiation of raw materials, this had not materialised and the TNPA was looking to develop areas set aside for break bulk, bulk and to handle containers by creating capacity to handle two-million TEUs. He said the port currently had four container berths of which two were fully operational and one was currently being equipped.

The steep bank to one side of the port and flat on the other would present significant development challenges in the future. However, because facilities handling bulk liquids, gases and chemicals did not need back up areas, it would be possible to locate these on the steeper side.

The development of the manganese facility was entering the execution phase. This was expected to handle between 22- and 25-million tons, depending on the equipment that the operator put on the berth.

The proposed Mthombo refinery and the granting of a licence to PetroSA for a petroleum pipeline directly to Gauteng would, if they proceeded, have a major impact on the port’s development however, if a pipeline was not built additional berths would have to be built in the ports of Durban and Ngqura to ship products coastwise. The TNPA had also looked into the need for additional berths should this licence not be granted and product needed to be transported to Durban for distribution. He said additional berths would then also be needed in Durban.

Simpson said an area on the breakwater had also been created to house a LPG gas facility and an area set aside for the repairing of rigs. This was expected to grow with the facilities carrying out the work being located in the IDZ behind the port.

When it came to Port Elizabeth, Simpson said that there were plans to relocate the manganese stock pile and tank farm to Ngqura although the ramifications and impact on jobs needed to be considered. He said this would free up a large area for development into recreational facilities in line with the TNPA’s people ports vision.

He said the TNPA had retained the option of developing the central basin alongside the port should the facility for future container handling prove too costly for developing container facilities in the port of Ngqura. This would also accommodate container traffic in the longer term. The TNPA also believed that the port could handle double the number of vehicles currently moving through Port Elizabeth, reaching 450 000 units.

Proposals to develop the Port of Mossel Bay were severely restricted by encroachment of the city. Nevertheless, there were plans to construct two deep-water berths and access for the public in terms of the peoples ports concept.

Cape Town, too, was limited by extreme congestion and pressure from the city to extend the waterfront. He said the RFP for a cruise liner terminal on E berth had gone out and that the TNPA was looking into the possibility of linking this with the waterfront.

He said the FPT licence was expiring in 2017 and might not be renewed. He pointed out that as most fruit was being containerised, there was only enough cargo to occupy one out of seven berths. Due to the fact that fruit is being containerised, opportunities exist to rehabilitate and consolidate cargo’s on the long berth.The TNPA had to look into using these more productively. However, plans for Cape Town did include two bulk liquid berths and the increasing of container capacity.

Saldanha Bay was “highly environmentally sensitive”, but there were plans for an additional iron-ore berth and a rig repair berth, and an oil rig berth at the port. An operator had been appointed to import LPG through the single-buoy mooring and that the TNPA was looking at a possible land acquisition for a tank farm.

Simpson said that as iron-ore volumes grew, the TNPA would look into expanding facilities. Once break bulk topped 85-million tons a year, Transnet would have to make a major decision whether to double the line from Sishen to the port or look for alternatives to export iron-ore. He said TNPA would “need to make a big decision” as to whether to expand the port facilities or reroute break bulk to another port.

The TNPA had been approached to look into the development of Port Nolloth for commercial purposes and would continue to do so. The jetty was being rehabilitated to accommodate fishing vessels.

Edited by Creamer Media Reporter

Comments

The content you are trying to access is only available to subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, you can Login Here.

If you are not a subscriber, you can subscribe now, by selecting one of the below options.

For more information or assistance, please contact us at subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za.

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION