Regional airline SA Express objects to business rescue ruling by court

7th February 2020

By: Rebecca Campbell

Creamer Media Senior Deputy Editor

     

Font size: - +

State-owned regional airline SA Express has reacted strongly to the ruling by the Johannesburg High Court on Thursday that it be placed in business rescue. The airline stated in a press release on Friday that it was seeking further legal advice on the matter. The company headed its release “SA Express slams Business Rescue judgement as unsatisfactory”.

(A service provider to SA Express, Ziegler SA, brought the application to the court to place the airline under business rescue. SA Express reportedly owes Ziegler R11.3-million and the airline is also reportedly technically insolvent.)

“The review of the judgement by SA Express’ lawyers indicates that the court exceeded what was required and granted orders not sought by the applicant,” stated the airline in its press release. “The court has also not made any order on whether the matter was urgent or not, in circumstances when the urgency was specifically opposed.”

In its statement, the airline affirmed that it had “disputes with the supplier” and that its board had been, in an orderly manner, “dealing with the malfeasance”. SA Express further noted that it had been “plagued” by suppliers who had overcharged it and applied unfair pricing. These suppliers were now under internal review by the airline.

“The airline states that it would be irresponsible and amount to wasteful and fruitless expenditure to make payment on invoices submitted by Ziegler in circumstances where it was aware of irregularities,” it asserted. “It would be absolutely criminal to allow further misuse of taxpayers’ money to reward a company whose contract has been identified, through forensic investigations, as irregular and in contravention of [the] PFMA [Public Finance Management Act].”

SA Express further averred that “tens of invoices” that had been authorised by the airline’s previous management had been found to contain discrepancies. “[I]t is on this, among a number of other issues, that the airline will appeal.”

Edited by Creamer Media Reporter

Comments

The functionality you are trying to access is only available to subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, you can Login Here.

If you are not a subscriber, you can subscribe now, by selecting one of the below options.

For more information or assistance, please contact us at subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za.

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION