Gauteng High Court declines relief for Sakeliga on CIPC matter

3rd June 2020

By: Simone Liedtke

Creamer Media Social Media Editor & Senior Writer

     

Font size: - +

The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) has welcomed the decision by the Gauteng High Court, in which it declined to give Sakeliga the relief it sought on the lawfulness of the Companies and Intellectual Commission (CIPC) certificates issued to companies permitted to render essential services during the first phase of the lockdown.

Sakeliga approached the court seeking an order declaring that the CIPC had no authority to issue the essential services certificates to companies and close corporations permitted to operate during the lockdown.

In the judgment, the court remarked that giving such relief would be “inappropriate”.

During the lockdown, the CIPC established an online registration platform for companies, which were permitted to operate as essential service businesses in terms of the regulations published by Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs Minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma.

The service was established as a voluntary service for companies who wished to log their details with government over the period. The platform, managed through the Bizportal, became popular with companies during the lockdown, with nearly 500 000 company registrations over the period.

Given that it was a voluntary, self-certification service to build a database of companies, Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Ebrahim Patel decided not to issue a direction that would have required companies to register.

The government’s lawyers pointed out prior to the matter being heard by the court that the service was voluntary, but Sakeliga persisted with its application.

During the hearing, which took place on the day that the Alert Level 3 Regulations were published, government’s legal representatives pointed out that the issuance of certificates would not continue under Alert Level 3, as the concept of essential services would no longer apply.

The court characterised Sakeliga’s contention that the certificates may be applied in future as “mere speculation”.

The court, therefore, declined to make an order in favour of Sakeliga, ruling that “it would be inappropriate to make any finding in respect of the declaratory relief directed at the CIPC issue”.

It further declined to make a cost order on the matter.

Edited by Chanel de Bruyn
Creamer Media Senior Deputy Editor Online

Comments

The functionality you are trying to access is only available to subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, you can Login Here.

If you are not a subscriber, you can subscribe now, by selecting one of the below options.

For more information or assistance, please contact us at subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za.

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION