Study makes economic case for renewables-first energy mix in SA

18th November 2016

By: Kim Cloete

Creamer Media Correspondent

  

Font size: - +

A study by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) has revealed that South Africa could radically cut its energy costs if it aims for a 70% renewable-energy share by 2040.

CSIR Energy Centre head Dr Tobias Bischof-Niemz provided details of the study, titled ‘Least-cost electricity mix for South Africa by 2040’ at the yearly Windaba conference, in Cape Town, last week.

The study has considered two scenarios, namely a ‘business as usual’ approach, which is generally aligned with the Integrated Resources Plan (IRP) of 2010, and an updated demand forecast. The former scenario incurs large building costs from new coal and nuclear projects, as set out in Eskom’s briefing in October to Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Energy.

The study’s ‘reoptimised’ scenario, meanwhile, looks at coal, nuclear, gas and renewable energy as supply options, with this scenario considering the least-cost option to meet energy and capacity requirements.

“The ‘reoptimised’ mix is almost R90-billion a year cheaper by 2040 than the ‘business as usual’ scenario,” says Bischof-Niemz, adding that, even if renewable energy were 50% more expensive than assumed, the ‘reoptimised’ option would still be cheaper than the ‘business as usual’ approach.

The study shows that the ‘reoptimised’ case would be almost 20c/kWh cheaper by 2040 than the ‘business as usual’ approach.

Wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) energy dominate the energy mix to 2040 in the ‘reoptimised’ scenario.

Actual solar PV, as well as wind tariffs, is currently well below the cost assumptions of the IRP, coming in at 62c/kWh, compared with baseload coal, which comes in at R1.03/kWh.

The cost of solar PV is expected to drop further, according to the CSIR analysis.

Assumptions based on the new-build cost puts nuclear at R1.17/kWh, combined-cycle gas turbine power at R1.24/kWh, open-cycle gas turbine gas at R2.40/kWh, midmerit coal at R1.51/kWh and diesel at R3.10/kWh.

The study shows that the ‘reoptimised’ mix would also reduce South Africa’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 60%, compared with a ‘business as usual’ approach.

“Avoiding CO2 emissions and least cost is not a trade-off anymore. South Africa can decarbonise its electricity sector at negative carbon-avoidance cost,” the study says.

Water use would also be lower.

“[A combination of] solar PV, wind and natural gas is the cheapest new-build mix for the South African power system,” the study concludes.

Building out the required capacities by 2040 would provide a steady anchor offtake for a South African PV and wind manufacturing industry, says the study.

Edited by Samantha Herbst
Creamer Media Deputy Editor

Comments

The content you are trying to access is only available to subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, you can Login Here.

If you are not a subscriber, you can subscribe now, by selecting one of the below options.

For more information or assistance, please contact us at subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za.

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION