Controversial plan to renegotiate IPP tariffs is proceeding

5th June 2020

By: Terence Creamer

Creamer Media Editor

     

Font size: - +

Eskom CEO Andre de Ruyter has confirmed that the State-owned electricity utility is pushing ahead with a controversial move to renegotiate power purchase agreements (PPAs) with renewables independent power producers (IPPs).

Speaking during a briefing on May 21, De Ruyter said that the renegotiation of IPP contracts had emerged as a key priority for organised labour at Eskom and that, following an analysis of the contracts, he believed that “there are opportunities for us to engage with those IPPs with a view to reducing the net cost to the South African electricity consumer”.

The renegotiation of the IPP contracts had also been mooted by Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan and Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe, who both indicated in 2019 that they saw scope for a reduction in tariffs, particularly those associated with projects procured under the first two bid windows of South Africa’s renewables procurement programme.

The proposal was controversial, as the 20-year PPAs were the outcome of competitive bidding processes and any move to renegotiate the terms would raise questions about government’s commitment to honouring contracts.

There was also uncertainty on how a renegotiation would improve Eskom’s financial position, owing to the fact that the PPAs were treated as a pass-through cost in Eskom’s allowable revenue by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa, making them revenue and cost neutral to the utility.

Nevertheless, De Ruyter suggested that the impact on Eskom was “complex” and that the allowance in the tariff for the recovery of IPP costs was, at times, “inadequate” when compared with the cost of Eskom’s own generation.

“I think that there is an opportunity for us to request IPPs to look at potentially refinancing – we think that some of the financing arrangements are potentially suboptimal and that there are opportunities to lower the financial cost and thereby also reduce the costs paid by Eskom to those IPPs.”

The first engagements had taken place and De Ruyter said he was “cautiously optimistic” that an acceptable outcome would be secured – an outcome “that serves the needs of the country, but also serves the needs of the investment community by allowing adequate investment certainty on these projects”.

Edited by Martin Zhuwakinyu
Creamer Media Senior Deputy Editor

Comments

The content you are trying to access is only available to subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, you can Login Here.

If you are not a subscriber, you can subscribe now, by selecting one of the below options.

For more information or assistance, please contact us at subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za.

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION