Competition Tribunal allows Mpact to intervene in Corruseal, Neopak merger

1st July 2022

By: Donna Slater

Features Deputy Editor and Chief Photographer

     

Font size: - +

The Competition Tribunal has granted paper and plastics packaging manufacturer Mpact leave to intervene in the intermediate merger proceedings between paper packaging company Corruseal and recycled containerboard company Neopak.

In March, the Competition Commission prohibited the proposed intermediate merger, following which the merger parties filed a request for consideration with the tribunal, seeking to have the proposed merger unconditionally approved or, alternatively, to have it approved with conditions deemed appropriate by the tribunal.

Thereafter, Mpact sought to be recognised as a participant in the request for consideration on the basis that it would be able to assist the tribunal in determining the competitive effects of the merger in the relevant markets.

However, Corruseal and Neopak opposed Mpact’s intervention application heard by the tribunal on June 22 on the basis of Mpact being a competitor to Corruseal and Neopak in the market for the supply of recycled containerboard and that is also active in downstream corrugating activities.

The tribunal’s order to Mpact limits its participation in the proceedings in terms of the merits to several issues, or theories of harm, including that the proposed transaction will increase the concentration of the 100%-recycled containerboard market. In this scenario, there will be a substantial lessening or prevention of competition in the market, Mpact believes.

It also details that the proposed transaction will give rise to input foreclosure in the corrugated board and corrugated packaging market, in that the customers of Corruseal and Neopak will be foreclosed from access to the merging parties’ 100% recycled containerboard.

This is both on the terms that they currently enjoy, or at all, in consequence of the merging parties supplying their 100% corrugated containerboard to Corruseal’s corrugator activities, and Corruseal expanding its corrugator activities.

Further, the tribunal notes that the proposed transaction will result in coordinated effects in the corrugating market, whereby Corruseal will have the incentive and power, from its increased supply of sheetboard to the Everest Group, to exercise disciplining power over the Everest Group in the corrugating market.

Edited by Chanel de Bruyn
Creamer Media Senior Deputy Editor Online

Comments

The functionality you are trying to access is only available to subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, you can Login Here.

If you are not a subscriber, you can subscribe now, by selecting one of the below options.

For more information or assistance, please contact us at subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za.

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION