DoE defends Russia nuclear cooperation deal

29th September 2014

By: Natasha Odendaal

Creamer Media Senior Deputy Editor

  

Font size: - +

With the deal between South Africa’s Department of Energy (DoE) and Russian-based nuclear giant Rosatom drawing controversy, the DoE has assured that the agreement was not the first by the department – and would not be the last.

Energy Minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson last week signed a nuclear power cooperation deal with the Russian State-owned firm that could see South Africa build up to 9.6 GW of nuclear power using Russian technology by 2030.

“The DoE has noted the ongoing public discourse around the recent agreement [that was signed] on behalf of the South African government,” the department said in a statement on Monday.

The DoE stated that the agreement and “the others South Africa have, and further intended to sign with other countries” was directed by the country’s energy policy, the Integrated Resource Plan of 2010, which outlined a mix of coal, nuclear, renewable energy, gas and hydro energy sources, besides others.

“South Africa has signed over 60 different energy-related cooperation agreements, addressing different aspects of energy and [the] use of different energy sources,” the DoE said, citing the example of the recent agreement with the Democratic Republic of Congo to ensure that the Grand Inga hydropower project progressed.

“It is within this context that our agreement with the Russian Federation on nuclear cooperation is based. The Intergovernmental Agreement on Strategic Partnership in Nuclear Energy is focusing on Russian[-based] technology [and] multipurpose nuclear research, assistance in the development of South African nuclear infrastructure [and] education of South African nuclear specialists in Russian universities and other areas.”

The agreement would undergo the “normal process” of internal government and legislative scrutiny and would be open to the public, the media, civil society and political parties.

“We, however, do appeal that the necessary due process, as stipulated in our country's statutes (laws and policies) be allowed to run their normal course,” the department pleaded.

The DoE also dismissed allegations of “undue influence” by President Jacob Zuma on the agreement.

“The allegations are baseless and, at worst, ludicrous and they are purely concocted to tarnish the image and integrity of the President and the government of South Africa,” the department said.

the department said.

Edited by Chanel de Bruyn
Creamer Media Senior Deputy Editor Online

Comments

The content you are trying to access is only available to subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, you can Login Here.

If you are not a subscriber, you can subscribe now, by selecting one of the below options.

For more information or assistance, please contact us at subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za.

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION