Civil society to challenge commission’s Arms Deal findings

18th August 2016

By: Sane Dhlamini

Creamer Media Senior Contributing Editor and Researcher

  

Font size: - +

Civil Society groups Corruption Watch (CW) and the Right2Know Campaign (R2K) announced on Thursday that they would challenge the findings of the Seriti Commission in the North Gauteng High Court in September.

The commission, chaired by Judge Willie Seriti, was tasked with investigating widespread allegations of corruption in South Africa's arms deal.

The organisations said in a joint statement that they aimed to ensure that of “one of the worst examples of corruption in South Africa’s history will not be whitewashed”.

Following a three-year investigation the commission found no evidence of corruption – despite massive volumes of evidence it had failed to look into during an investigation that cost the public over R100-million.

Millions of documents, collected and stored by the now disbanded Scorpions, went unexamined.
 
CW and R2K said the court application would be aimed at setting aside the findings on the basis that the commission did not carry out a proper investigation and had “simply accepted evidence which was presented to it by those who were involved in the arms deal, without questioning it or testing it”.

The organisations will not seek the establishment of a new enquiry but would limit relief to the setting aside of the commission's findings. 

Further, the organisations allege that the commission’s leadership was tainted from the start on account of procedural irregularities which included crucial information and documents being withheld from the public and from witnesses and participants. 

Vital witnesses were not called and witnesses seen as “critics” were hampered unfairly while several commission staff members had resigned in protest at the commission's conduct, the CW and R2K said.

Arms deal critics, represented by independent organisation Lawyers for Human Rights, withdrew their participation, contending that they had been treated unfairly.

The civic organisations contend that the commission did not conduct the inquiry in accordance with its mandate, and that serious procedural irregularities undermined the credibility of its findings.

Edited by Sashnee Moodley
Senior Deputy Editor Polity and Multimedia

Comments

The content you are trying to access is only available to subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, you can Login Here.

If you are not a subscriber, you can subscribe now, by selecting one of the below options.

For more information or assistance, please contact us at subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za.

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION