Creamer Media’s Engineering News Online
Advanced Search
 
 
 
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
powered by
GOLD 1747.99 $/ozChange: 14.33
PLATINUM 1668.00 $/ozChange: 10.00
R/$ exchange 7.59Change: -0.03
R/€ exchange 10.10Change: -0.08
 
ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
SA economy at bottom of downturn, to grow by 2,1% in 2010
 
18th June 2009
TEXT SIZE
Text Smaller Disabled Text Bigger
 

Businesses had to know where in the business cycle they were positioned and what their sensitivity to the business cycle was, to enable them to survive the downturn, economic analysis firm IHS Global Insight senior economist for South Africa Ronèl Oberholzer said on Thursday.

There were six phases in the business cycle, she explained during the IHS Global Insight Southern Africa conference, noting that South Africa was now in the second phase of a downswing, with leading indicators showing a change of direction in economic activity.

The country’s economy had reached the bottom of its downturn and while some risks still remained, the remainder of 2009 would be characterised by consolidation and stabilisation of the economy, followed by stronger growth in 2010.

South Africa entered its first recession in 17 years in the first quarter of 2009, with contractions in gross domestic product (GDP) expected to continue in the second and third quarters of the year.

However, this was not South Africa's worst recession, said Oberholzer, pointing out that the country had seen worse recessions in the 1970s and 1980s when sanctions were implemented against the country over its apartheid policies.

South Africa’s GDP would most probably contract by 1,3% for 2009, but would improve to 2,1% in 2010 and 3,9% in 2011, the IHS forecast.

The biggest drivers of an upswing in the country’s economic growth would be final consumption by households, followed by exports, Oberholzer said.

She added, however, that consumption by households was sensitive to interest rates and that a 100 basis point cut in the repo rate would add 0,32% to household consumption growth in 12 months time.

This would also lead to a 0,27% growth in the county’s GDP in 12 months time.

The 4,5% cuts in total that the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) has made in the repo rate since December last year would contribute 1,5% to consumption expenditure throughout 2010, she noted.

Oberholzer did not expect the country’s inflation to fall in the 3% to 6% range targeted by the SARB this year, but said that this would likely occur in the first quarter of 2010, as the country’s output gap increased and food prices came down.

She warned, however, that there were some risks as a 100 basis point increase in the repo rate could lower the country’s economic growth by up to 0,3% in 2009.

She also said that a 2% cut in the repo rate, as demanded by labour union the Congress of South African Trade Unions at the beginning of June, could potentially overstimulate the economy, which could have negative consequences for the country’s future growth.

Further, demand for South Africa’s exports would be lead by the growth in the global economy.

A 1% drop in the average global growth compared with the baseline would led to a drop in the expected price growth of the country’s main export commodities, namely gold, platinum and coal, which would lower the country’s economic growth by up to 0,4% in 2009.

Real exports of goods and services growth could also decline by as much as 1,7%, she noted.

Oberholzer said that businesses that tended to lead the business cycle, such as those in the mining, finance and exports sectors, could gear itself for a recovery towards the end of this year.

Those that coincided with the business cycle, should plan for improved conditions in 2010, while businesses in sectors that were lagging the cycle, such as construction, should only expect to start seeing improved conditions by late 2010 or early in 2011.

Edited by: Mariaan Webb
FULL Access to Mining Weekly and Engineering News - Subscribe Now!
Subscribe Now Login
 
 
 
 
 
Hide Comments  
 
Readers Comments
 
image image
I'm sure that our esteemed writer of this article has a lot of qualifications to call herself an economist but an Oracle I would call her not. As I non practicing economist myself there is not too much that I can agree with and hearing that we are almost six months away from the bottom of the cycle is absolute hogwash. In my opinion the decline is still in its infancy and there will be no bottoming for quite some time. Although it was apparent to predict a bubble, I don't think it is remotely possible to predict the upturn. Our esteemed colleague has forgotten that most of the public spending and consequent foreign cash inflow will be halted after the World Cup and the prospects of a global recovery are far away. People seemed to ignore the fact that Japan, one of the worlds' largest economies, had just turned the corner in a deflationary cycle before the global meltdown occurred and I certainly believe that this country will not emerge from the recession until it too experiences some form of deflationary cycle. Let me elaborate further, the boom was caused in many respects by over borrowing, which has now dried up. In other words, people don't have other peoples money to spend, instead they need to start clearing their own debt or face the consequences. In my opinion the average man is five years away from clearing his debt and that is if he manages to keep his job. Bring deflation into the equation five years down the line, most people will be to afraid to invest as prices will be on a constant downslope and we might only start to see a bottoming some time thereafter. If I were to make a prediction, I would say that our esteemed writer is a few years off predicting the bottom of the cycle. Yes its nice to be an optimist, but sometimes we have to be realists too. The other thing is not to fret too much, life still goes on. The only differences is that there will be very few excesses that go along with it. At the end of it all we will all come out of it better. Most things will cost less than what they cost now and we will be able to afford more without having to go the bank to borrow. It will then be in our own hands to ensure that we don't make the same mistakes again, which somehow I doubt...........
image image 
image
Mr M. on 19 Jun 09