Creamer Media’s Engineering News Online
Advanced Search
 
 
 
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
powered by
GOLD 1720.77 $/ozChange: -2.60
PLATINUM 1622.70 $/ozChange: 2.18
R/$ exchange 7.56Change: -0.01
R/€ exchange 9.90Change: 0.01
 
Aerospace
Aerospace industry leader cautions on ending A400M programme
 
15th October 2009
TEXT SIZE
Text Smaller Disabled Text Bigger
 

Cancellation of South Africa’s participation in the troubled Airbus Military A400M airlifter project would gravely affect the country’s aerospace industry, warned Aerosud MD Dr Paul Potgieter on Thursday.

Talking to Engineering News Online, he said that “if South Africa cancelled the A400M, it would seriously damage the local aerospace industry.” Aerosud is South Africa’s largest private-sector aviation industrial company.

South Africa is a risk-sharing partner in the A400M programme, with eight of the aircraft on order for the South African Air Force. South African companies involved in the programme are Aerosud, Denel Saab Aerostructures, (both with the status of risk-sharing partners), Grintek and Omniples, with Armscor providing engineering services.

On Wednesday, South African defence acqusition, disposals and research and development agency Armscor CEO Sipho Thomo told the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Defence that the acquisition costs for South Africa for all eight A400Ms had soared from R17-billion to R47-billion.

Aerosud is mainly responsible for secondary structures on the A400M. These are – nose fuselage linings, cargo hold linings, and cockpit linings, but the company is also making the cockpit rigid bulkhead, the wing tips, and the nose fuselage galleys. The wing tips are quite important because they will contain elements of the aircraft’s defence aids subsystem.

“From an Aerosud perspective, we are hugely committed to the growth of the South African aerospace industry,” affirmed Potgieter. “We regard the relationship with Airbus, including the A400M, as a most valuable attribute in achieving this. We have invested heavily in developing this relationship. Investing in adopting Airbus methodologies, certification and processes. We want to capitalise on this and grow this relationship.”

“I am not in a position to comment on the cost escalation figures quoted, but anything that would damage this relationship would be of extremely great concern for us,” he cautioned. “The problems on the A400M are not unique. There have been cost escalations on the Gautrain, on the stadiums for the 2010 FIFA World Cup, and on the Boeing 787, for example.”

A total of 192 A400Ms are on order by nine countries.

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
FULL Access to Mining Weekly and Engineering News - Subscribe Now!
Subscribe Now Login
 
 
 
 
 
Hide Comments  
 
Readers Comments
 
image image
This program is a disgrace. The a400m have been delayed 5years in a row, The price have escalated from the original R 11bn to R 17 bn and now R47 bn. SA a developing country cannot afford that. There are other alternatives which is proven, a fraction of the price and with all the capabilities the A400 have. This is also not the end of the disaster if the track record of airbus is anything to go by. Next year will be more and we are much better served by cancelling the program, buy a better alternative, and spend some of the funding to support our aerospace industry. The comment s of Dr. Potgieter above is not the whole story, benefits a small interest group including his own company and is peanuts vs the money now asked.
image image 
image
Anonymous on 15 Oct 09
image image
Aerosud's comments are blatantly self-serving. Originally these aircraft had been envisaged to cost some R1.5-billion apiece (versus R1.75-billion for the Boeing C17 which has twice the cargo capacity) . South Africa is now expected to pay R6-billion apiece for something which has been truly screwed up in engineering and manufacturing. You can purchase twenty Airbus A380 at that price and actually get some real commercial return on investment. This is truly a disgusting boondogle.
image image 
image
Jeremy May on 15 Oct 09
image image
But why must the South African tax payer have to pay for this? We also have to pay for the ESKOM upgrade. We have to pay for the infrastructure for the 2010 World Cup. Can somebody tell us where the South African tax payer are going to get the money to pay for all of this? We're already deep in debt. But I notice the government MPs and cabinet have luxury cars and homes.
image image 
image
Neville Paynter on 15 Oct 09
 
A400M
 
A400M
A photograph of the first A400M, which Airbus Military reported in September had been fitted with the fourth of its powerplant, including the propeller.
 
A photograph of the first A400M, which Airbus Military reported in September had been fitted with the fourth of its powerplant, including the propeller.
 
Previous Play Next