May 08, 2012
RMS, Vulcania fined in mesh wire cartel caseBack
Murray & Roberts Steel|Reinforcing Mesh Solutions|Steel|Vulcania
© Reuse this
The Competition Commission said on Tuesday it initiated an investigation in 2008, when BRC Mesh Reinforcing, through its parent company Murray & Roberts Steel, admitted its involvement in the cartel, which also included RMS, Vulcania and Aveng Africa (trading as Steeldale Mesch). Murray & Roberts was granted conditional immunity from prosecution, provided it cooperated with the commission during its investigation.
In the tribunal’s hearing, it emerged that, after the cartel discussed and agreed on prices derived from a set formula at industry meetings, industry association the South African Fabric Association circulated recommended price lists for adoption by members. This allowed the companies to simultaneously pass on input cost increases to their customers by providing a common mechanism for deriving the final price.
Vulcania, which denied that its attendance at the meetings amounted to an agreement to join the cartel, was found to have participated in the cartel from January 2006 until January 2008.
Vulcania stated that it only attended meetings to ensure continued supply from its competitors by way of making them believe the firm was part of the cartel. However, the tribunal found that whether Vulcania’s participation was ‘real or a sham’, Vulcania benefited from the cartel as it amounted to protection from potential competition.
The commission said RMS, which was found to be involved in the cartel from January 2004 until January 2008, admitted liability, but argued the extent of its involvement in the cartel and also whether a penalty could be competently imposed upon it and if it could, what an appropriate penalty was.
RMS, further, denied the commissions claim that the company undertook organisational restructuring before the cartel was exposed to avoid penalties, adding that the change was for commercial reasons and, at the time, it was not aware of any legal action against it.
RMS argued that it had no turnover in the relevant financial year and therefore, no penalty could be levied on it. The Tribunal, however, determined the appropriate penalty based on the “earliest preceding year of normal turnover”.
The tribunal, for the first time, based its determination of the penalties on a new six-step approach under the European Union 2006 penalty guidelines, as with an earlier Competition Appeal Court finding in a Southern Pipeline Contractors case in 2011.
Aveng settled the case with the commission in April 2011 and paid an administrative penalty.
Edited by: Mariaan Webb© Reuse this Comment Guidelines
Other Competition Policy News
Article contains comments
Recent Research Reports
Steel 2014: A review of South Africa's steel sector (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s Steel 2014 report provides an overview of the global steel industry and particularly of South Africa’s steel sector over the past year, including details of production and consumption, as well as the country's primary carbon steel and stainless...
Projects in Progress 2014 - First Edition (PDF Report)
This publication contains insight into progress at the delayed Medupi and Kusile coal-fired projects, in Mpumalanga and Limpopo respectively, as well as at the Ingula pumped-storage scheme, which is under construction on the border between the Free State and...
Automotive 2014: A review of South Africa's automotive sector (PDF Report)
The report provides insight into the business environment, the key participants in the sector, local construction demand, geographic diversification, competition within the sector, corporate activity, skills, safety, environmental considerations and the challenges...
Construction 2014: A review of South Africa's construction sector (PDF Report)
Construction data released during 2013 hints at a halt to the decline in the industry during the last few years, with some commentators averring that the industry could be poised for recovery. However, others have urged caution, noting that the prospects for a...
Electricity 2014: A Review of South Africa's Electricity Sector (PDF Report)
This report provides an overview of the state of electricity generation and transmission in South Africa and examines electricity planning, investment in generation capacity, electricity tariffs, the role of independent power producers and demand-focused initiatives,...
Defence 2013: A review of South Africa's defence industry (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s 2013 Defence Report examines South Africa’s defence industry, with particular focus on the key players in the sector, the innovations that have come out of the defence sector, local and export demand, South Africa’s controversial...
This Week's Magazine
The Electronic Systems Laboratory (ESL) of the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering at Stellenbosch University is strongly reaffirming its position as one of South Africa’s leading centres for satellite technology and expertise. It is currently...
The world’s lowest-cost diesel-electric locomotive is not made in China, but in Pretoria, at RRL Grindrod Locomotives’ newly upgraded 30 000 m2 plant. The company’s locomotive pricing is “more competitive than any other original-equipment manufacturer (OEM)...
The South African Defence Review 2012, released to the public at the end of last month (despite the year given in its title) recommends the creation of the post of Chief Defence Scientist. This official would be responsible for the management of defence technology...
AltX-listed engineering technology company Ansys has been awarded an R188-million contract by Transnet to supply integrated dashboard display systems to the freight rail utility’s locomotives. Black-owned and controlled Ansys developed the bespoke integrated system...
South Africa’s sole nuclear power station Koeberg, which is located in the Western Cape, breached a major operations milestone on April 4, which marked the thirtieth anniversary of Unit 1 having been connected to the grid. Eskom, which operates the two-unit plant,...