Creamer Media’s Engineering News Online
Advanced Search
 
 
 
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
powered by
GOLD 1731.85 $/ozChange: -4.92
PLATINUM 1660.00 $/ozChange: 14.00
R/$ exchange 7.56Change: -0.01
R/€ exchange 10.02Change: -0.11
 
COEGA SMELTER
Rio Tinto criticises SA for Coega power pullout
 
2nd February 2010
TEXT SIZE
Text Smaller Disabled Text Bigger
 

Diversified miner Rio Tinto on Tuesday criticised South Africa for reneging on the Coega aluminium smelter agreement.

Rio Tinto CE diamonds and minerals Harry Kenyon-Slaney told a mining conference in Cape Town that South Africa's cancellation of the electricity agreement was not condusive to attracting foreign direct investment (FDI).

"The recent cancellation of the electricity agreement with Eskom led to the cancellation of the project. This cancellation will not induce foreign direct investment into South Africa," Kenyon-Slaney said.

Rio Tinto signed the agreement  at a high-profile function several years ago.

Kenyon-Slaney had told the conference earlier that one of the minerals that Rio Tinto continued to seek in Africa was bauxite, the aluminium raw material.

He also emphasised that the company operated in a manner in Africa that ensured that the people shared in the benefits of mining.

"The contribution that mining makes to Africa is often under-estimated. Mining generates jobs and brings in significant FDI," he said.

But the provision of power supply, ports and rail services provided by governments "must work".

Electricity supply was an "absolutely critical" issue for Africa and Eskom's proposed electricity-tariff increases would have a negative impact.

The company is active at Richards Bay Minerals and Palabora in South Africa, Rossing uranium in Namibia, is working with BHP Billiton in iron-ore in West Africa and has diamond interests in Zimbabwe.

 

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
FULL Access to Mining Weekly and Engineering News - Subscribe Now!
Subscribe Now Login
 
 
 
 
 
Hide Comments  
 
Readers Comments
 
image image
It is a sad day for South Africa if businesses are pushed away because we cannot provide the necessary energy. Electricity is the most important commodity to ensure development like industries, residential, agriculture etc etc. We do have the technology in South Africa to produce 5 times more electricity from a ton of coal, without any emmissions or pollutions, than what Eskom is poducing at the moment. Presentations were made to Eskom and tenders were submitted but to no avail. South Africa must look at themselves if they want to point fingers and stop finding excuses and try blaming other countries.
image image 
image
Anonymous on 03 Feb 10
image image
SA needs to be selective as to the type of FDI it seeks to attract in future. Two factors are important here: Energy and Emmissions. Eskom had a "silver lining" from 1987 to 2007 to utilise its excess capacity to the benefit of SA by attracting energy intensive investments that made some contribution above the low marginal cost. This was exploited through the expansion of Alusaf (Hillside), the development of Mozal and other smaller projects. The opportunity to develop initially a Zinc smelter and then the Aluminium was frittered away by the indicisiveness of the ANC government. The window is now closed and there is no longer excess capacity so we need to seek lower energy FDI opportunities. We are about 20th on the list of carbon producers. Also needs to be addressed as much of this is for goods which we export - the consumers need to carry this burden.
image image 
image
Anonymous on 03 Feb 10
image image
We don't want FDI, we want jobs. Aluminium smelters are one of the most energy intensive per job created industries. We need the power for other industries that create more jobs. Also, we dont want to import aluminium from Australia, refine it here, export it, and add massively to our carbon footprint while Rio benefits, we want to shift to a low-carbon economy where the polluter pays.
image image 
image
User not found. on 03 Feb 10
 
 
Picture by: Bloomberg News