Creamer Media’s Engineering News Online
Advanced Search
 
 
 
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
powered by
GOLD 1773.73 $/ozChange: 16.83
PLATINUM 1718.00 $/ozChange: -1.00
R/$ exchange 7.74Change: 0.00
R/€ exchange 10.25Change: 0.00
 
RENEWABLE ENERGY
Renewables project developers pore over tender documents
 
4th August 2011
TEXT SIZE
Text Smaller Disabled Text Bigger
 

Potential independent power producer (IPP) bidders for South Africa’s first 3 725 MW of renewable energy capacity are poring over the request for qualification and proposals documentation, which was released at 18:00 on August 3, 2011.

The Department of Energy (DoE) confirms that it has allocated capacity across various renewables technologies, with 1 850 MW set aside for onshore wind, 200 MW for concentrated solar thermal, a further 1 450 MW for solar photovoltaic solutions, 12.5 MW for both biomass and biogas, 25 MW for landfill gas capacity, 75 MW for small hydro, and a further 100 MW for small-scale IPP projects of less than 5 MW.

Some developers have immediately indicated that the enlargement of the procurement capacity beyond the 1 025 MW set out for the first procurement round in the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) 2010-2030 is a welcome development.

However, questions were also asked both about the credibility of the IRP as a guideline for new generation capacity, as well as whether the 3 725 MW framework is indeed of a sufficient scale to encourage investment by green-energy original equipment manufacturers (OEM).

Nevertheless, potential participants are grateful that the process, which was initially expected to start in April, is finally under way, albeit that their favoured procurement model is not being deployed.

The renewables industry has indicated that they would have preferred it if the request for proposals (RFP) had been premised on predetermined renewable-energy feed-in tariffs (Refit). But government has abandoned the Refit in favour of a selection process that would involve both price and nonprice elements, having raised concerns about its legal compatibility with government procurement rules, as well as the fact that such schemes had in other countries led to prices that could now not be sustained.

JUNE 2014 TARGETED

The RFP shows that projects will only be considered if the can feasibly enter commercial operation by June 2014. However, concentrated solar thermal projects will qualify if they are able to show that commercial operations can be achieved by June 2015.

Besides meeting these timelines, projects would also need to pass land-security, environmental, grid-connectivity, primary-energy availability, technical-feasibility, generation-forecasting, legal, black economic-empowerment, economic-development, as well as regulatory thresholds.

For instance, wind developers would need to provide 12 months of wind data from the proposed site, as well as an independently verified generation forecast, and show that the proposed contractors have participated in at least two previous projects. The projects would also only qualify if they were larger than 1 MW and smaller than 140 MW in size and include turbines that are IEC 64-100-certified.

Similar criteria have been set for the solar projects but greater emphasis is given to water use and availability. Fuel supply agreements, meanwhile, are central to the biomass and biogas projects, while possible developers of landfill gas sites would also need to be in possession of a public-private partnership agreement with the relevant municipality that was in accordance with Section 120 of the Municipal Finance Management Act. The small hydro bids would, meanwhile, require an independent review of the hydrology information, as well as at least 10 years of flow data.

The documentation also indicated that four criteria would be used to make a financial evaluation of the project including price, financial standing, robustness and delivery of the funding proposal, and robustness of the financial models.

Bidders would be required to provide their proposed prices per MWh for the energy output to be generated, through the applicable technology, along with full or partial inflation indexation. The price indication would be for the first 20 years of operation, or for the duration of the power purchase agreement (PPA).

The IPPs will be authorised to enter into a PPA with Eskom, as the buyer, once the DoE has selected them.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THRUST

But besides the pricing, financial, legal and technical criteria, the IPPs would also need to show how their projects could stimulate job creation, local content and local manufacturing, rural development and community involvement, education and development of skills, enterprise development, socioeconomic development and participation by historically disadvantaged citizens.

Overall, the economic development aspects will comprise 30 points in the eventual evaluation process, with job creation and localisation carrying the biggest weighting of 25% each.

Government is particularly keen on the localisation aspects as the New Growth Path and the Industrial Policy Action Plan have placed green industries at the centre of South Africa’s plans to grow employment and to stimulate manufacturing investments and activities.

DoE deputy director-general Ompi Aphane tells Engineering News Online that the upscaled procurement programme has been pursued to make the programme more attractive to those OEMs considering localisation options.

The DoE indicated that all bids should be accompanied by a “bid guarantee” equal to R100 000 for every megawatt of installed capacity proposed. Further, prior to accessing the RFP, prospective bidders would be required to make a nonrefundable payment of R15 000 and to complete a registration form, which was available for download at www.ipp-renewables.co.za.

A mandatory bidders briefing session has been scheduled for September 14, at 10:00.

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
FULL Access to Mining Weekly and Engineering News - Subscribe Now!
Subscribe Now Login
 
 
 
 
 
Hide Comments  
 
Readers Comments
 
image image
Let me give some perspective.... The consumers have already paid for the electricity that will be generated from renewable energy - MYPD2. Secondly, the is no running away from an increasing cost of electricity, which was kept superficially low for a long time - basing it on old coal-fired power generation. Now the cost of building a new coal power station will cost you as much per megawatt as for a renewable energy plant, if not more. Electricity tariff are are going up even when there is insignificant contribution from renewables -why? Because the cost of new build is high. Thirdly, if job creation from green economy is a "myth", what is not? Here facts and stats speak for themselves. The numerous international examples of the number of jobs created from the broader green economy. Sufficient critical mass for renewable energy will kick start a local manufacturing industry that will provide for the highly needed jobs. My question is do we want to be always behind in everything, even where is an obvious growth potential? Government must be commended for getting renewable energy procurement process started!
image image 
image
Methuli Mbanjwa on 08 Aug 11
image image
"The New Growth Path and the Industrial Policy Action Plan have placed green industries at the centre of South Africa’s plans to grow employment". Then the unemployed are doomed! It is an absolute myth that “green” power generation is a serious contender for job creation. This is about the most inefficient and costly way to create a few paltry jobs that could be conceived. Not to mention the many more jobs that will be lost (and fail to be created) throughout the economy due to a needless spiralling of energy costs and the starvation of financial resources needed to stimulate real economic growth. All that will happen is that a small oligarchy of vendors (mostly foreign) and hangers on will grow fabulously rich at the expense of driving our economy into the ground. That won’t worry them of course, but the rest of us will have to live with the resulting mess.
image image 
image
Chris Herold on 05 Aug 11
image image
I need to comment on the fact that we as consumers will be forced to pay 6 to 10 times more for electricity when we are forcred by government to use reneweables to generate elcectricity. Is this fair with no input from the consumer - and how can our poor consumers afford this higher price for electricity?
image image 
image
Dawie van Wyk on 05 Aug 11
image image
Why does the Department want R15000 (non-refundable) for sight of its RFP? It disbars public comment - is that what they want? Or we need?
image image 
image
The Iceman Cometh on 05 Aug 11