R/€ = 13.05Change: 0.01
R/$ = 12.04Change: -0.21
Au 1165.48 $/ozChange: -6.65
Pt 1160.50 $/ozChange: -2.00
Note: Search is limited to the most recent 250 articles. Set date range to access earlier articles.
Where? With... When?

And must exclude these words...
Close Main Search
Close Main Login
My Profile News Alerts Newsletters Logout Close Main Profile
Agriculture   Automotive   Chemicals   Competition Policy   Construction   Defence   Economy   Electricity   Energy   Environment   ICT   Metals   Mining   Science and Technology   Services   Trade   Transport & Logistics   Water  
What's On Press Office Tenders Suppliers Directory Research Jobs Announcements Letters Contact Us
RSS Feed
Article   Comments   Other News   Research   Magazine  
Apr 12, 2013

Nuclear power should be shunned on economic, enviro and ethical grounds

Construction|Engineering|SECURITY|Africa|CoAL|Environment|Eskom|Mining|Nuclear|Renewable Energy|Renewable-Energy|Security|Waste|Water|Africa|Mozambique|South Africa|United States|Security|Southern African Faith Communities Environment Institute|Baseload Electricity|Electricity|Energy|Energy Efficiency|Energy Experts|Energy Mix|Energy Needs|Energy Neutral|Energy Research Centres|Nuclear|Nuclear Energy|Private Banks|Proposed New Nuclear Energy Build Programme|Renewable Energy|Renewable-energy Potential|Security|Economic Development Western Cape|Dipuo Peters|Indaba|Jacob Zuma|Kgalema Motlanthe|Nelisiwe Magubane|Power|Pravin Gordhan|Security|Waste|Water|Scientific American|The Economist|The Engineering News
Construction|Engineering|SECURITY|Africa|CoAL|Environment|Eskom|Mining|Nuclear|Renewable Energy|Renewable-Energy|Security|Waste|Water|Africa||Security||Energy|Nuclear|Security||Indaba|Power|Security|Waste|Water|
© Reuse this

By: Geoff Davies

Leaders from a wide cross section of the faith community are seeking an urgent meeting with Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe and have endorsed the call by Minister in the Presidency responsible for the National Planning Commission Trevor Manuel for a national Energy Indaba.

This follows a report in the Engineering News of February 22, which stated that Department of Energy director-general Nelisiwe Magubane had said South Africa was likely to reach a “point of no return” by June this year with regard to its proposed new nuclear energy build programme.

In his State of the Nation address, President Jacob Zuma endorsed the National Development Plan, which has questioned the advisability of nuclear power. Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan said in his Budget speech that South Africa must “adapt to a low-carbon economy, including the mobilisation of our renewable-energy potential”. It is unclear whether the Minister views nuclear energy as ‘low carbon’. Nevertheless, statements of commitment to nuclear energy have been made.

Faith leaders are extremely alarmed at such statements, given the rising evidence regarding the consequences for society, the economy, job creation and the environment.

The Western Cape Religious Leaders Forum, the KwaZulu-Natal Inter-Religious Council, the South African Catholic Bishops Conference’s Justice and Peace Commission and the Southern African Faith Communities Environment Institute all wrote to Zuma last year, but have received no response. A small group met with Energy Minister Dipuo Peters in July 2012 to express their concern. She confirmed that she believed in an “energy mix”, stating that she was “energy neutral”. The delegation stated that one cannot be neutral when it comes to nuclear energy.

It is well known among economists and energy research centres that nuclear energy:
• would provide the fewest jobs;
• is exposed to financial risks, such as exchange rate fluctuations;
• could end up costing several times more than renewable energy, which is declining in cost and can be financed by independent power producers;
• would cause fuel prices to continue escalating; and nuclear energy advocates do not ever state the massive costs of decommissioning nuclear plants and dis- posing of nuclear waste.

This is why private banks and the World Bank have always refused to fund nuclear power stations – this is left to governments and their taxpayers.

The Economist magazine published a special edition on nuclear energy (March 10 to 16, 2012), saying that it has priced itself out of serious consideration.

Scientific American published a special edition in November 2009 that stated: “Wind, water and solar power could supply the world’s energy needs by 2030.”

The Electricity Governance Initiative, a civil society forum of energy experts, showed in 2012 that, with energy efficiency and renewable energy, South Africa could meet all its energy needs at a lower cost and with far higher employment potential than it would with government’s current plans, which include nuclear and additional coal-fired plants.

Yet Eskom and government continue to perpetuate the myth that baseload electricity can only be generated by coal or nuclear. While this used to be true, new technology and information show that this is no longer the case. Such significant advances in renewable energy have been made, and continue to be made, that renewable energy can provide a reliable electricity supply at reduced cost. Already figures from the Department of Energy and Eskom are showing that the cost of electricity from the new Medupi and Kusile coal-fired power stations will be higher than renewable-energy costs for wind and photovoltaic (PV).

Nuclear energy, based on current estimates, costs at least twice the price of wind and PV, and it will take at least 12 years to generate electricity (according to information from the Department of Economic Devel- opment Western Cape, the German Green Party and the Union of Concerned Scientists in the US).

Natural gas off the coast of Mozambique (not shale gas!) could be brought to South Africa’s coastal cities within two or three years where, combined with renewables, it would provide a robust baseload capacity and save the 30% energy lost in bringing electricity from Mpumalanga.

Taxpaying South Africans have to pay the capital costs – either through taxes or increased tariffs – of R385-billion for the two new coal-fired power stations, while the proposed ‘six-pack’ of nuclear plants will set us back R940-billion (according to figures provided by Eskom).

It is also a myth that nuclear energy will assist in reducing South Africa’s carbon footprint. The costs of mining uranium ore are increasing with the diminishing availability of high-grade uranium, as are the costs of transport and construction. All these processes are highly carbon intensive. What is more, with the long build times, nuclear power will come on line too late to address the urgent need to reduce our carbon emissions.

The IRP2010 was due to be renewed in 2012, and already the predictions it made with regard to demand for electricity have been found to be significantly inflated, compared with the reality. It would be irresponsible for government to make a decision on nuclear power based on data that is known to be outdated.

We know that government is following the IRP2010, which includes nuclear energy. Zuma has stated government wants to root out corruption, but government must know the danger of corruption and fraud associa- ted with nuclear, which requires secrecy, as it is a security risk. There is great danger that those ‘in the know’ and in power might have vested interests in promoting nuclear energy, particularly given the scale of investments involved. The arms deal involved R70-billion. Imagine what could happen with R940-billion. We are talking about investments 14 times greater.

Centralised energy generation is not the direction in which the country should go. We need decentralised energy generation that puts power in the hands of the people. Centralised electricity is for the benefit of the extractive industries and smelters – not the two-million largely impoverished households dotted across our rural areas. The high energy paradigm benefits capital investors, who prefer to invest in machines rather than people, resulting in a decline in employment. They also invest for financial returns and not the development of people, communities or the protection of the environment.

We, in South Africa, face a particular dilemma. We must overcome poverty, unemployment and inequality. We must also reduce our carbon emissions because of climate change. But we, members of faith communities, believe that God has given us the answer: invest in, and develop, a low-carbon, labour-intensive economy. This will dramatically improve the health of the planet, create thousands of distributed jobs and, by putting energy in the hands of people instead of centralised national and multinational corporations, will help overcome our present gross inequality and so reduce poverty.


  • Bishop Davies is executive director of the Southern Africa Faith Communities' Environment Institute -
Edited by: Martin Zhuwakinyu
© Reuse this Comment Guidelines (150 word limit)
Other News This Week News
The World Bank, the European Union, the African Development Bank (AfDB) and the government of Sweden have agreed to provide Zimbabwe and Zambia with $294-million for the repair of structural deformations on the Kariba dam wall and avert the possible collapse of the...
Global Electricity Initiative executive chairperson Philippe Joubert
Executive chairperson of the Global Electricity Initiative (GEI) Philippe Joubert says energy utilities globally, together with the business community more generally, have come to terms with the science of climate change, particularly as extreme weather events begin...
Latest News
The Sustainable Energy Society of Southern Africa (Sessa) on Friday called on the Department of Energy (DoE) to follow its three-step “rescue plan” aimed at resolving the uncertainty surrounding the administration of the solar rebate programme. Sessa said its...
South Africa's National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) said on Friday it would oppose any attempt by cash-strapped power utility Eskom to sell assets, especially its finance company which helps provide home loans to employees. Eskom CE Tshediso Matona told the Reuters...
Recent Research Reports
Construction 2015: A review of South Africa’s construction sector (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s Construction 2015 Report examines South Africa’s construction industry over the past 12 months. The report provides insight into the business environment; the key participants in the sector; local construction demand; geographic diversification;...
Liquid Fuels 2014 - A review of South Africa's Liquid Fuels sector (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s Liquid Fuels 2014 Report examines these issues, focusing on the business environment, oil and gas exploration, the country’s feedstock supplies, the development of South Africa’s biofuels industry, fuel pricing, competition in the sector, the...
Water 2014: A review of South Africa's water sector (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s Water 2014 report considers the aforementioned issues, not only in the South African context, but also in the African and global context, and examines the issues of water and sanitation, water quality and the demand for water, among others.
Defence 2014: A review of South Africa's defence industry (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s Defence 2014 report examines South Africa’s defence industry, with particular focus on the key participants in the sector, the innovations that have come out of the sector, local and export demand, South Africa’s controversial multibillion-rand...
Road and Rail 2014: A review of South Africa's road and rail infrastructure (PDF report)
Creamer Media’s Road and Rail 2014 report examines South Africa’s road and rail transport system, with particular focus on the size and state of the country’s road and rail network, the funding and maintenance of these respective networks, and the push to move road...
Real Economy Year Book 2014 (PDF Report)
This edition drills down into the performance and outlook for a variety of sectors, including automotive, construction, electricity, transport, steel, water, coal, gold, iron-ore and platinum.
This Week's Magazine
The World Bank, the European Union, the African Development Bank (AfDB) and the government of Sweden have agreed to provide Zimbabwe and Zambia with $294-million for the repair of structural deformations on the Kariba dam wall and avert the possible collapse of the...
Global Electricity Initiative executive chairperson Philippe Joubert
Executive chairperson of the Global Electricity Initiative (GEI) Philippe Joubert says energy utilities globally, together with the business community more generally, have come to terms with the science of climate change, particularly as extreme weather events begin...
JAMES TEMPLETON Emira’s operational performance is the best it has been in a long time
JSE-listed Emira Property Fund reported distribution growth per participatory interest (PI) of 9% for the six months ended December 31, 2014.
JOAN MACNAUGHTON Many countries were also struggling to balance the energy trilemma of energy security, energy equity and environmental sustainability
Sub-Saharan Africa is still faced with the challenge of providing citizens access to electricity and an additional $450-billion will need to be invested to ensure that people in urban areas have access to electricity by 2040.
ABE THELA Cuban engineering skills are not recognised by the Engineering Council of South Africa
Consulting Engineers South Africa (Cesa) last month said it was dismayed that the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) was seconding 35 Cuban engineers on a two-year contract to share their expertise with South African engineers in the water sector.
Alert Close
Embed Code Close
Research Reports Close
Research Reports are a product of the
Research Channel Africa. Reports can be bought individually or you can gain full access to all reports as part of a Research Channel Africa subscription.
Find Out More Buy Report
Engineering News
Completely Re-Engineered
Experience it now. Click here
*website to launch in a few weeks
Subscribe Now for $96 Close
Subscribe Now for $96