It seems government’s love affair with bus rapid transit (BRT) systems has cooled. Courted in the Brazilian city of Curutiba – it is difficult to find a local government transport executive who has not been there on a study tour – and sworn to fidelity in the pressure cooker years before the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa, once ardent fervour has now turned to discontent. High capital expenses and subsidies, coupled with low ridership, have muddied the waters for a system that was once regarded as the silver bullet that would provide fast, affordable public transport for all.
‘We Don’t Have BRT’
“We don’t have any BRT in South Africa,” says Department of Transport public transport policies director Ibrahim Seedat.
He says Cape Town’s MyCiti has one trunk route, and Johannesburg’s Rea Vay “probably one-and-a-half”.
“For the rest, we don’t have anything. We only have two cities kind of operating a partial Phase 1.”
Seedat’s biggest gripe is lack of scale, or ridership, on the country’s BRT systems.
“The challenge is that you need to carve out some scale, or show it’s financially viable at least.
“Tshwane should never have launched in 2014. You cannot launch a bus service if you are projecting 8 000 passengers a day – not even a bus service, let alone anything with dedicated lanes; that’s just insanity.
“They are running at 3 000 . . . 4 000 [passengers]. That is not even a taxi service. What you’re seeing is not a BRT. It is like having a hospital with one patient.
“When Tshwane gets to Shoshanguve and Mamelodi, then we start talking.
“In Johannesburg and Pretoria I’ll score us at 45% to 50% – the rest at 30%.”
Seedat says MyCity has the highest patronage of all BRTs in South Africa, at about 75 000 passengers a day.
He adds that the successful imple- mentation and running of BRT systems will require “scale and political will” over the next two to five years.
“We need BRT to be 25% to one-third of public transport in a city.
“We need strong, functional, capable public authorities with the capacity to regulate, plan and enforce.
“We have [everything] to play for; there is no naivety left.”
Seedat says the problem is partly that there is no “day zero” for public transport in South Africa.
Here he references the drought in Cape Town, where the metro indicated a specific day in the immediate future when there would be no water left to service the city, unless use patterns changed.
The move from car use to public transport will only happen if there is enforcement from “the very top”, says Seedat.
Rea Vaya currently has between 50 000 and 60 000 passengers a day.
However, says University of Pretoria Centre of Transport Development/Department of Civil Engineering associate professor Christo Venter, subsidies and operating costs have been rising sharply since 2012, while fares have remained flat.
National Treasury data shows that BRT carries 2% of public transport passengers in the country’s six metros, while municipal buses carry 1%, conventional buses (like Putco) 8%, taxis 67%, the Gautrain 1% and Metrorail 21%, says Venter.
All these services are subsidised, bar minibus taxis.
The operating costs per passenger carried on BRT is R20.90, with taxis at R8.09 and municipal buses at R24.42.
The fare revenue per person carried is R4.39 for municipal buses, R8.09 for taxis and R7.77 for BRT.
The subsidy per passenger carried is R18.41 for municipal buses, zero for taxis and R12.84 for BRT.
“These numbers show that we are getting efficiency improvements in BRTs, compared with other bus modes,” says Venter.
The irony, however, he notes, is that taxis receive no subsidies, but that “a lot of BRT users are moving from taxis to BRTs”.
BRT systems, if well designed, can easily reach 30 000 passengers per hour per direction, provided there is corridor capacity, says University of Johannesburg Department of Transport and Supply Chain Management head Professor Jackie Walters.
An Embarq study found that Rea Vaya averages 5 760 passengers per hour per direction for Phase 1a.
Rea Vaya boardings per bus per day are in the order of 400 passengers for Phase 1a.
Comparable numbers in the Embarq study for passengers per hour per direction are 3 300 in Jinan, China; 3 600 in Jakarta, Indonesia; 8 000 in Beijing, China; 10 500 in Mexico City, Mexico; 11 000 in Curituba; and 45 000 in Colombia.
Embarq is a programme of the World Resources Institute.
South African cities have low urban density, which means BRT buses have to travel greater distances, compared with other BRTs in the world, such as those in Peru and Mexico.
This also means the local systems have to move “lots of people over long distances in peak periods, but with little activity in between”, says Venter.
“So, we have low vehicle productivity.”
When considering whether South Africans are receiving all the benefits BRTs promise, the results are a mixed bag.
BRT users are travelling faster than car users over the same corridor, owing to BRT’s dedicated bus lanes, while there is also increased capacity over the corridor with some congestion reduction.
However, operating costs are high and use low, which places a question mark over the system’s sustainability in terms of its cost effectiveness.
To date, dedicated BRT stations have also not led to an improvement in the surrounding urban environment.
The problem, adds Venter, is that BRT users first care about costs, then short walks and waits for the bus, followed by service quality and reliability, with many users not willing to pay for faster travel times.
“So, the whole theory of investing [in BRT] to get high speeds falls on its face.”
“There is probably less scope for full BRT in our cities than we originally imagined,” states Venter.
An alternative future for BRTs is to focus on service quality, coverage and price, rather than capacity and speed, he says.
“We can experiment with a lighter, more flexible approach on low-demand routes. We can go with an intermediate setup without the massive funds full BRT requires.
“We went with full BRT. Full BRT is not the only option.”
It would be possible to retain full BRT – dedicated stations and lanes, with its high infrastructure costs – on “a few, high-demand, shorter corridors”, says Venter.
Walters agrees, noting that ‘BRT Light’, which does not require the heavy engineering of building a median station, for example, could be considered a future solution.
It could also be beneficial to integrate the BRT system better with existing public transport systems.
Venter says that consideration should be given to taxis using the priority lanes along with the BRT buses and other public transport.
Reform under Way
There are 13 cities in South Africa that apply for and receive a Public Transport Network Grant from central government for their Integrated Public Transport Network (IPTN) plans.
“We are reforming this process,” says National Treasury City Support Programme consultant Tobie Pretorius.
The reform process includes making sure all IPTN plans are updated.
“In 2009, BRTs were the flavour of the month. All IPTNs now need to be updated to incorporate bus services, rail and taxis in that 20-year forecast. Cities need to design plans with quality bus services and minibus taxis, and not only BRT,” he emphasises. “IPTN planning is not BRT planning.”
Pretorius adds that South Africa’s urban rail system is “in trouble”.
Most big metros have rail, but there have been “major issues” on the implementation of projects and the maintenance of existing projects.
“It is crucial rail is up and running soon.” In executing this reform process, a number of issues have emerged, explains Pretorius.
These include the fact that cities which do not yet operate BRTs or public transport networks tend to be overoptimistic with regard to operational costs, while a lack of technology and management capacity is a major issue in some cities. IPTN plans are also submitted with insufficient data.
Pretorius adds that cities seem to rely “a lot on consultants”. However, he warns that cities need “a strong internal team to manage consultants well”.
Cities also require a political leader for IPTN implementation, but that leader is often lacking.
“We are putting together toolkits to help cities with IPTN planning and submissions,” Pretorius concludes.