Creamer Media’s Engineering News Online
Advanced Search
 
 
 
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
powered by
GOLD 1745.65 $/ozChange: 8.88
PLATINUM 1651.04 $/ozChange: 5.04
R/$ exchange 7.57Change: -0.02
R/€ exchange 10.04Change: -0.13
 
OIL
Mthombo oil refinery is in SA’s best interest – PetroSA
 
25th February 2010
TEXT SIZE
Text Smaller Disabled Text Bigger
 

National oil company (NOC) PetroSA on Thursday defended its plans to build the 400 000-bl/d project Mthombo crude oil refinery, at Coega, in the Eastern Cape, saying this would “be in the best interest” of South Africa.

This followed on petroleum group BP Africa’s call on the government, last week, to proceed with caution before approving the construction of the $9-billion to $11-billion greenfield refinery.

BP had called for a review of other supply-side options, including the expansion of existing refineries, as it felt that the project might not be in the best interest of taxpayers and which it warned could cost more than expected.

PetroSA president and CEO Sipho Mkhize highlighted in a statement on Thursday that the crude oil refinery was “totally in line” with government’s Energy Security Master Plan, as well as with the recently announced second Industrial Policy Action Plan, which was aimed at expanding production in value-added sectors by replacing imports, as well as at creating jobs.

“Although, clearly, the refinery will be commercially competitive, it addresses several of South Africa’s pressing needs that are just not considered by BP,” said Mkhize, adding that thousands of new jobs would be created, while the Eastern Cape region would also experience some economic upliftment.

Further, the refinery’s development would be a catalyst for clean fuels in the country and would play a major role in the transformation of the oil industry, he said.

Mkhize emphasises that PetroSA understood why some international oil companies (IOCs) would not want the refinery to be built, as this would mean that the company would remain “increasingly reliant” on imported product.

It would also mean that profits generated in the regulated South African market was not reinvested, to any major extent, in the country, which was “clearly not in South Africa’s best interest”, he added.

The Department of Energy’s (DoE’s) deputy director general of hydrocarbons and energy planning Tseliso Maqubela on Wednesday told delegates at an energy conference that the country would not wait until it was completely at the mercy of oil imports before taking a decision on building a new crude oil refinery.

“Project Mthombo’s development has been an open, transparent and inclusive initiative during which PetroSA has, on numerous occasions publicly invited the local IOCs to participate in the venture. A few have shown interest in this invitation that includes exploring synergies between Mthombo and the existing local refineries,” said Mkhize.

Meanwhile, PetroSA highlighted that the greenfield project was now ready to proceed into the front-end engineering design (FEED) phase, which would take a further 15 months and which would include several key decision “gates”, during which progress and developments would be rigorously reexamined.

Once the FEED phase was completed, a recommendation would be made for the final investment decision, which PetroSA expected to be made in early 2012.

Edited by: Mariaan Webb
FULL Access to Mining Weekly and Engineering News - Subscribe Now!
Subscribe Now Login
 
 
Topics in this article
 
 
 
 
Hide Comments  
 
Readers Comments
 
image image
spot on Petrosa go for it, Sipho and BP are governed by enlightened self iterests thank you Petrosa for bringing hope and sunshine to ordinary SA citizens that we are taking steps to guide the destiny of our economy
image image 
image
Anonymous on 26 Feb 10
image image
This is bare hypocrisy of a multi national.Its not surprising though, all they want is to generate wealth here and leave us at their mercy. What has BP done in its regions of operation?in west Africa for example,nothing except explotation and exiting when the resource is finished. Remember Sakalin in Russia?that is what the third world and Africa in particular should be treating these Oil majors.
image image 
image
Mr C Moyo on 26 Feb 10
image image
Many questions/concerns have to be answered before this investment goes ahead, such as: Where is the millions of necessary millions of 3meter of water going to come in a region prone to drought ? Is the tar sand coming from Venezuela going to be refined in PE hence importing SA huge environmental issues in SA ? Where is the study which place this undertaking within the long term mitigation framework and the commitment to decrease GHG by 34% by 2020 ? Where is the study which prioritise this investment in relation with many better renewable alternatives in the context of climate changes and peak oil ? How many times more the PetroSA CEO is paid comapared to its minister ? What is the Petro sa Millenium Developmental goal with regards to the halving poverty by 2014 and protecting the environment ? As we have seen in the latest speeches of Minister Peters, DOE does not take at all the CC and peak oil threats into consideration. While these and many others critical questions are not answered, this huge investment should be considered as another white political elephant (very similar to the RioTinto drown plan). Regards
image image 
image
Pierre_LOuis Lemercier Renewable Energy Centre Port Elizabeth on 26 Feb 10
image image
The benefit of this refinery to South Africa is a mystery. It is time the Government stopped wasting time and money on the project. There are two perspectives to be considered: 1. Would it be a smart investment for our nation? 2. Is this the best place to put scarce South African money? The refinery does not improve fuel security for the nation because crude oil will be imported instead of finished product. It may even reduce flexibilty of supply thus damaging refined product security. It will not create a large number of long-term jobs. It is poorly placed to distribute products (main products and by-products) to local and/or foreign markets and as a result the business case will be dubious. The refinery has no special advantages to support its viability in the face of significant disadvantages relative to refineries being developed elsewhere. Its size and product quality are impressive against existing local refineries but not against international competitors. Without a "strategic" contribution there is no basis for a subsidy to assist the viability. South Africa would be better served using its scarce financial resources in developing benificiation projects for South Africa minerals, rather than embarking on what is a very expensive de facto benificiation project for imported raw materials.
image image 
image
John Roberts on 26 Feb 10