R/€ = 15.15Change: -0.01
R/$ = 14.28Change: -0.01
Au 1072.00 $/ozChange: 0.67
Pt 852.50 $/ozChange: 0.00
Note: Search is limited to the most recent 250 articles. Set date range to access earlier articles.
Where? With... When?

And must exclude these words...
Close Main Search
Close Main Login
My Profile News Alerts Newsletters Logout Close Main Profile
Agriculture   Automotive   Chemicals   Competition Policy   Construction   Defence   Economy   Electricity   Energy   Environment   ICT   Metals   Mining   Science and Technology   Services   Trade   Transport & Logistics   Water  
What's On Press Office Tenders Suppliers Directory Research Jobs Announcements Letters About Us
RSS Feed
Article   Comments   Other News   Research   Magazine  
Oct 29, 2010

Immigration policy needs rethink

© Reuse this

Ahallmark of South Africa’s immigration policy has been the haste with which legislation has been tabled by the Department of Home Affairs and passed in the past seven or eight years.

While the White Paper on Migration was tabled after what can only be described as an extremely thorough consultative process, on the day the Immigration Act was passed by Parliament in 2002, the then Minister announced that it was deeply flawed and already needed to be amended. An amendment was rushed through from start to finish in a matter of months in 2004 and came into operation in 2005. But that was imme- diately seen as being flawed and an amendment was driven through Parliament and passed in 2007 – but, again, after a very brief consulta- tive process. However, the 2007 Act has yet to come into operation.

The 2010 Amendment Bill, presented to Parliament recently against the background of the amnesty for Zimbabweans, seeks to amend the 2007 Act and the earlier amendment – and to wade into critical debates about the importation of skills without the benefit of the 1999 White Paper being reviewed and with input from stakeholders.

A remarkable feature of the Bill is the concession in the memorandum that there has been no consultation on the Bill – even if the few stakeholders that had been spoken to thought they had been consulted. This is truly a case of the tail wagging the dog.

What is the country’s national immigration policy? Currently, the closest we come to a national immigration policy is in the preamble to the 2002 Immigration Act, which consists of a series of largely prudent statements based, to some extent, on the White Paper. To date, there has been no significant tinkering with the wording of that preamble.

However, there is a widening void between key provisions of that preamble, on the one hand, and a number of provisions of the current Act, provisions of the 2010 Bill and Department of Home Affairs practice, on the other. For example, the preamble provides that “economic growth is to be promoted through the employment of needed foreign labour, foreign investment is facilitated [and] the entry of exceptionally skilled or qualified people is enabled . . .” and that “the South African economy may have access at all times to the full measure of needed contributions by foreigners”.

Significant New Entries in the 2010 Bill
Why does the Department of Home Affairs propose in the 2010 Bill that permits for the ‘exceptionally skilled’ be scrapped altogether? Why would it require that, to extend their current permits, the foreigner and his or her family pack their bags, return to their country of origin, apply for the extension back home – which may be at an embassy far from the foreigner’s home – and await the outcome before returning to South Africa (if the application is approved)?

Why does it propose that these foreigners, whom we need, take time off from their jobs to travel to embassies or regional offices and stand in queues themselves?

Why has it been deemed necessary to scrap the exchange permit that allowed the country to attract, and to sell itself to, young skilled persons, even if only as a tourism destination?

Why does the department propose to limit foreign investment to only those companies falling within the sectors of the economy prescribed to be of strategic interest, while the Minister of Trade and Industry tells his Botswana counterpart that we do welcome foreign investment?

And why is the depart- ment offering unskilled workers from Zimbabwe a better and speedier deal on temporary permits than it does to skilled persons who are badly needed by our companies?

The Bill also states that minors, even if they are infants, will not be allowed to enter the country unless they are travelling on their own passports – and not the passport of one or other of their parents, as still happens?

The Bill – in what is perhaps the only real development in immigration policy – proposes a radical increase in criminal and administrative penalties for contraventions of the Act, including overstaying. One challenge here is that, as we have seen in recent months, people can find themselves overstaying without there being any fault on their part whatsoever and owing entirely to poor planning on the part of the Department of Home Affairs.

Strange but Worryingly True

There are two significant entries in the Bill that can be described as being strange but worryingly true.

The first requires all ‘conveyances’ (methods of transport) to transmit electronically to the department the details of all passengers before the carrier departs for South Africa. A problem here is that the term ‘conveyance’ includes not just ships and planes, but also taxis and ‘any other means of transport’. So the long-distance taxi loading up in Harare or Maputo will need to transmit its list of passengers and other ‘prescribed information’ electronically to the Department of Home Affairs before it leaves.

The second is very disturbing and smacks of ‘Big Brotherism’. The duty to disclose, in advance, the list of passengers on a flight will extend to internal flights too. The Bill proposes that this is required “for the better achievement of the objects of this Act”, but does not tell us why it is needed or what interest Home Affairs could possibly have in such information and what it would do with that information.

Significant Omissions
But so much for what the Bill does deal with. What about the ongoing shortcomings in the Bill that the department has not seen fit to propose correcting?

Over a decade ago, the Constitutional Court directed the department to resolve the matter of the rights of foreign spouses of South Africans in existing relationships. The current Act still does not properly capture those directions and the Bill makes no mention of these omissions.

The Bill continues to leave the estranged foreign spouse dangling in the wind and at the mercy of either the former South African spouse or the principal permit holder. If the foreign spouse needs to stay in the country to be with the couple’s children, to work (particularly if he or she is not skilled), or even merely because he or she has spent many years living here, there is simply no convenient category of permit in the Act.

Recently, Home Affairs Deputy Minister Malusi Gigaba reportedly said that the Bill dealt more with permanent residence than with temporary residence. However, the current Act provides that, if a person has been on a work permit for five years, he or she quali- fies for permanent residence. However, the foreigners cannot include their families in the application for permanent residence. The families must await the outcome of that application and then apply for permanent residence on the basis of their newly found familial relationship to a permanent resident.

If you qualify for permanent residence because you have a prescribed scare skill, you can include your family in that application. And if you are self-employed, you qualify to apply for permanent residence – and, again, you can include your family in that application. But if you qualify for permanent residence on the grounds that you are retiring here, you cannot include your family. Nor can you include them if you are deemed to be exceptionally wealthy – they too must wait for you to get your permanent residence and then they need to apply as relations of a permanent resident. There is simply no logic to this arrangement, but there is no suggestion that it will be corrected any time soon.

This Bill points to having been drafted by narrow sectoral interests within the Depart- ment of Home Affairs without regard to national or international policy parameters or the needs of other departments. A significant number of provisions and omissions suggest that Parliament is being asked to intervene and patch over administrative shortcomings. Why ban immigration agents instead of subjecting them to proper training and regulation? Suspicions continue to linger that some of the underlying logic is motivated by xenophobic thinking within the department, despite its multibillion-rand series of makeovers.

Coherent immigration policy, together with legislation reflecting such a policy, is central to ongoing economic development in South Africa. If this Bill is to be taken through Parliament without the benefit of the country getting – and ‘inputting into’ – a new immigration policy, then let us not rush this Bill through Parliament.

This only makes more work for the courts. And the only victims will be companies trying to work with the system and persons who might have been employed by companies that will no longer come here.

Friedrich Nietzsche reportedly said that “one will rarely err if extreme actions be ascribed to vanity, ordinary actions to habit, and mean actions to fear”. The importance of a properly managed immigration policy demands that we have the courage to step back from adopting ‘mean actions’ driven by our irrational fears of the unknown.

Edited by: Martin Zhuwakinyu
Creamer Media Senior Deputy Editor
© Reuse this Comment Guidelines (150 word limit)
Other Chris Watters News
The long-awaited amendments to the Immigration Act have ‘happened’. Both the 2007 and 2011 amendments, along with a wholly revised set of regulations, were promulgated on May 23 and came into effect on May 26. But are these the long-awaited panacea sought by...
So, for the estimated 230 000 Zimbabweans who are sitting with their 2010 ZDP permits, the truth has come out and the waiting is at an end. Cabinet has decided that the holders of these permits, most of which expire in 2014, "will be expected to reapply for their...
Amid all the dust and fury over the Guptagate saga, little seems to have been said about the possible role of the Department of Home Affairs – or of yet another errant official – in all this.
Article contains comments
Article contains comments
Latest News
Business confidence has dropped by a full 15 points over the past year to reach its lowest level in five years, the latest Rand Merchant Bank (RMB)/Bureau for Economic Research (BER) Business Confidence Index (BCI) has shown. After falling from 43 to 38 in the third...
JSE-listed beverage, food and nonperishable packaging manufacturer Nampak’s basic earnings a share rose 3% to 228.3c for the year ended September 30, from 221.7c the year before. The company also reported an increase in group revenue and trading profit of 13%, to...
As Parliament mulls the new regulatory framework to govern South Africa’s financial industry, the sector is preparing for its promulgation; however, it will require a complete “rethink” of the way regulators guide financial institutions. The tabling of the Financial...
Recent Research Reports
Water 2015: A review of South Africa's water sector (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s Water 2015 Report considers the aforementioned issues, not only in the South African context but also in the African and global context in terms of supply and demand, water stress and insecurity, and access to water and sanitation, besides others.
Input Sector Review: Pumps 2015 (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s 2015 Input Sector Review on Pumps provides an overview of South Africa’s pumps industry with particular focus on pump manufacture and supply, aftermarket services, marketing strategies, local and export demand, imports, sector support, investment...
Liquid Fuels 2015: A review of South Africa's liquid fuels sector (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s Liquid Fuels 2015 Report examines these issues in the context of South Africa’s business environment; oil and gas exploration; fuel pricing; the development of the country’s biofuels industry; the logistics of transporting liquid fuels; and...
Road and Rail 2015: A review of South Africa's road and rail sectors (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s Road and Rail 2015 report examines South Africa’s road and rail transport system, with particular focus on the size and state of the country’s road and rail infrastructure and network, the funding and maintenance of these respective networks, and...
Defence 2015: A review of South Africa's defence sector (PDF Report)
Creamer Media’s Coal 2015 report examines South Africa’s coal industry with regards to the business environment, the key participants in the sector, local demand, export sales and coal logistics, projects being undertaken by the large and smaller participants in the...
Real Economy Year Book 2015 (PDF Report)
There are very few beacons of hope on South Africa’s economic horizon. Economic growth is weak, unemployment is rising, electricity supply is insufficient to meet demand and/or spur growth, with poor prospects for many of the commodities mined and exported. However,...
This Week's Magazine
Updated 2 hours 49 minutes ago The BMW Group will invest R6-billion at BMW Group South Africa’s (BMW SA’s) Rosslyn plant to produce the next-generation X3 sports-activity vehicle (SAV) for the local and export markets. Rosslyn will continue production of the current 3 Series through its lifecycle,...
Updated 2 hours 49 minutes ago The lack of consequences for poor performance and transgressions on the part of contractors remains a significant hurdle to tackling South Africa’s service delivery challenges, delegates heard at the Consulting Engineers South Africa Infrastructure Indaba, on...
Updated 2 hours 49 minutes ago City of Ekurhuleni executive mayor Mondli Gungubele earlier this month officially named the city’s bus rapid transit (BRT) system, Harambee.
NICK CHRISTODOULOU As about 58% of data stored by organisations is dark, they must identify this dark data to expose risks and valuable information
Updated 2 hours 49 minutes ago About 58% of unstructured data stored by companies is dark data, which means that the value or regulatory importance of the data has not been determined. Subsequently, most of the stored data add costs, rather than increasing revenue or reduce regulatory risks, says...
BRIAN VERWEY Effective management, review and administration of non-core elements can improve business operations and increase revenue and decrease unforeseen risks
Updated 2 hours 49 minutes ago Effective logistics, import/export and manufacturing consulting services require detailed industry knowledge and experience, but can add significant value to these industries by providing expert advice on various technical elements in their value chains, says...
Alert Close
Embed Code Close
Research Reports Close
Research Reports are a product of the
Research Channel Africa. Reports can be bought individually or you can gain full access to all reports as part of a Research Channel Africa subscription.
Find Out More Buy Report
Engineering News
Completely Re-Engineered
Experience it now. Click here
*website to launch in a few weeks
Subscribe Now for $96 Close
Subscribe Now for $96