Creamer Media’s Engineering News Online
Advanced Search
 
 
 
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
powered by
GOLD 1735.00 $/ozChange: -1.77
PLATINUM 1665.00 $/ozChange: 19.00
R/$ exchange 7.57Change: -0.01
R/€ exchange 10.03Change: -0.12
 
INFRASTRUCTURE
Coega oil refinery ranks among top global infrastructure projects
 
29th June 2010
TEXT SIZE
Text Smaller Disabled Text Bigger
 

National oil company PetroSA’s proposed 400 000-bl/d project Mthombo crude oil refinery has been showcased in a list of the top 100 global infrastructure projects compiled by UK-based Infrastructure Journal and professional services firm KPMG International.

“Infrastructure development is one of the great global challenges of our time. The idea of the Infrastructure100 is to showcase some of the exciting projects that are under way around the world to address this challenge. These are ambitious, yet essential projects,” commented KPMG global head of infrastructure Nick Chism.

The refinery, which was estimated to cost between $9-billion and $11-billion and which was expected to come on stream in 2015, was featured in the Oil & Gas category of the ‘Infrastructure100’ report.

The compilers of the report noted that the project was of “huge economic significance” to the African region and that it would “modernise” South Africa’s “long-outdated” energy infrastructure in the process.

Once built, the refinery would be the biggest in Africa and would reduce South Africa’s reliance on oil imports.

PetroSA estimated that the country would have to import about ten-billion litres a year of fuel by 2015, which would negatively impact on the country’s foreign exchange reserves.

However, it was the project’s expected socioeconomic benefits that made it stand out to the judges.

PetroSA has previously reported that the refinery would provide up to 30 000 temporary jobs during the construction phase and 1 000 permanent jobs once it was operational, as well as a further 15 000 jobs in associated industries.

The researchers highlighted that the project would form an “economic bridge” in the Eastern Cape region, where unemployment was rife.

PetroSA has repeatedly defended the new crude oil refinery while facing criticism from competitors that the project could cost more than expected and that the additional refining capacity might not be needed.

President and CEO Sipho Mkhize has said that the project is in the best interests of the country and that it was in line with government’s Energy Security Master Plan.

The project also had the support of Energy Minister Dipuo Peters.

Rival oil companies, including BP Africa have, however, called for a review of other supply-side options, including the expansion of existing refineries.

Meanwhile, the Gautrain rapid rail project, telecommunications firm Neotel and the Nelson Mandela Children’s Home also featured on the Infrastructure100 list.

Edited by: Mariaan Webb
FULL Access to Mining Weekly and Engineering News - Subscribe Now!
Subscribe Now Login
 
 
 
 
 
Hide Comments  
 
Readers Comments
 
image image
This mega project is the begining of greater things to come, job creation, industrial development in the Eastern Cape, critics like BP and Shell, are worried how they will make profit with PetroSA taking the lead in Supply of finished petroleum goods, this means less earnings for them to present to their European principals, Go PetroSA Go! Go! We support you.
image image 
image
Anonymous on 11 Aug 10
image image
Iceman, you are wrong about your "oversupplied market" comment. We already import fuel to sustain our demand. This will only grow with time (assuming moderate economic growth). PetroSA's existing facility in Mossel Bay was largely touted as a waste of money and a white elephant by critics (such as yourself) when it was built by the previous reigime. Today it is a successful multi-million rand revenue facility. In addition, it lifted Mossel Bay from a mere fishing village to a sustainable, economically sound town. We sholud not be short sighted with Coega. While I agree that this article (and perhaps KPMG) might be focusing on the positives without commenting on the negatives, on the balance of it, this could be something very special for the Eastern Cape in particular, and SA in general.
image image 
image
Anonymous on 01 Jul 10
image image
If that is KPMG's idea of a prize project, then their credibility sinks to nil. Who but our ever-acute Government would propose to build an oversized refinery in the wrong place to supply an oversupplied market. It isn't difficult to see that it is a recipe for a disaster - it takes a group like KPMG who couldn't even see the Fannie Mae disaster staring them in the face to give Government's plan a prize.
image image 
image
The Iceman Cometh on 30 Jun 10